Team activities can teach more skills for life than other activities which are played alone. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
It is undeniable fact that team effort more likely to teach more skills than personal performance. Both of these have certain benefits and drawbacks. I partially agreed with this statement. I will discuss these in the following paragraphs.
To embark with, the evidences are plenty to prove why personal effort is imperative us to get skills in the life. The mammoth recognisable fact is that since individual effort provide us an unique strength, it assists to explore each and every area of our goal. Due to the individual performance, masses can attain much experience as well as can test their skills in variety of areas. Without doing individual activities, people are unable to identify their strength and limitations. In addition, it teaches us how to devote best performance under tremendous pressure as no one is backing us. For example, Tiger always live alone and hunt for food individually.
In the contract, team efforts give us a chance to tackle formidable situations in the life. Owing to the team work, it helps us in order to gain confidence from others team member. With the help of effective team work, people can solve toughest issues in less time and also give best performance. Team efforts provide more skills and new experience which could be prove beneficial in the later life. To illustrate, lion lives in a group and share food with other. Thus, team effort plays a key role in the life.
To sum up, team work and individual act both equally crucial and we should explore these to achieve knowledge and to get success in the life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-13 | Veet ganger | 61 | view |
- It is often considered that change is more beneficial to people than trying to avoid it and have everything remain the same. Do you think the advantages of changes outweigh the disadvantages. 73
- Prison is the best way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide people a better education. Do you agree or disagree. 61
- An increase in production of consumers goods result in damage of the natural environment. What are the reasons and possible solutions. 78
- Some companies sponsor sport as a way to advertise themselves. Some people think that it is good, while others think that there are disadvantages. Dicuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than other activities which are played alone. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...that since individual effort provide us an unique strength, it assists to explore ...
^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'devote the best'.
Suggestion: devote the best
...ions. In addition, it teaches us how to devote best performance under tremendous pressure a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'solve the toughest'.
Suggestion: solve the toughest
...help of effective team work, people can solve toughest issues in less time and also give best ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'give the best'.
Suggestion: give the best
...e toughest issues in less time and also give best performance. Team efforts provide more ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, thus, well, for example, in addition, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89473684211 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65708371032 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586466165414 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1469377319 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5882352941 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6470588235 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228593101174 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696401864375 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579296273848 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126913993454 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537023503657 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.