Technological development leads to lots of environmental issues. Some people think a simple life can preserve environment while others argue that technology itself can solve it. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
While living in a straightforward way is thought to be able to conserve the nature, some other people still believe that the technology can also have ability to do this. This essay will discuss both of these views.
On the one hand, it is true that a simple lifestyle has caused little negative impact on the environment because there is no need for us to use a large number of natural resources to develop up-to-date technologies in all respects such as medicine, transportation and so on. In fact, to contribute to the wealth of the country, many governments allow a lot of companies which dispose a great deal of poisonous smoke into the atmosphere, to be open. Moreover, agriculture nowadays is also a main factor resulting in colossal negative impact on the environment. For example, cutting down trees for cultivation and abusing chemical fertilizers for the yield of the crop with a better productivity are also conducive to the soil erosion and global climate change.
On the other hand, modern technology can make it possible to address the environmental issues. Actually, to ensure the speed of economic growth as well as the contentment in people's lives, scientists and the authorities are breaking their back to devise contemporary devices ti enhance the quality of the nature surroundings. For instance, solar batteries are used to absorb the heat and the light from the Sun for hot water and lightning at our houses. Therefore, instead of limiting our productive activities, we can better the environment thanks to prevailing equipments.
In short, technology is both advantageous and detrimental to the environment. Personally, technology still plays an intrinsic and indispensable key in our daily life despite all its deterioration to the nature.
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 84
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos xan be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both views and give you own opinion 73
- These days a great number of children prefer spending time on computer games rather on sports Why Is it a positive or negative development 85
- The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they gave birth to their first child in 1966 1986 and 2006 73
- Some people feel that entertainers( e.g. film stars, pop musicians or sports stars) are paid too much money.Do you agree or disagree?Which other types of job should be highly paid? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a straightforward way" with adverb for "straightforward"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
While living in a straightforward way is thought to be able to conserve the n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... because there is no need for us to use a large number of natural resources to develop up-to-date...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'devices'' or 'device's'?
Suggestion: devices'; device's
...aking their back to devise contemporary devices ti enhance the quality of the nature su...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in fact, in short, such as, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15679442509 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10652923085 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641114982578 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1824408624 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8333333333 7.06120827912 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222940912368 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793941322986 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704122039401 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134139960041 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046697967572 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.