Technology has been largely integrated in education and in the future robots will even take the role of teachers To what extend do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Technology has been largely integrated in education, and in the future, robots will even take the role of teachers.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?

It is some suggestion that more and more people nowadays become increasing used technology in education, and in the future, robots might take the place of teachers. For my personal perspective, I am against completely this matter.
Central to this point is that teachers play a vital to motivate their students. This is because teachers help them involve in the materials or make them more active. For example, one has the advantage of using game in class. It is a good way for students to understand what is being taught to them because of having competition, while robots are just learning tools and they are likely to make feeling bored. As the result, teachers are able to convey their knowledge to children easier thank to successful learning experience.
The other reason is that the most positive effect which related to human interactions between teacher and the participation in class. Teacher have competency in leave the legacy of relationships and self-discipline with his student. How good the teacher is will decide how well the student learn; in fact, students just learn and imitate behaviors what their teachers do, while robots lack of emotional intelligence to do that. Teachers usually teach children not only basic knowledge linked to subjects but also develop their social skills. It is consideration to be very useful to push their performance further in the future.
In conclusion, although robots are play important roles of expanding student’s horizon, I strongly believe that teachers are still of greater importance in education.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-02-04 miyokichi 61 view
2020-02-04 miyokichi 61 view
Essays by user miyokichi :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, still, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21031746032 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82910348531 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1172456183 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158012721601 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471721289566 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435233618676 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914942933718 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247050058133 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.