in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development

In a dominant economic time, companies always publicize their product that is so perfect and has many new useful functions compared with other brands. There are many reasons why the companies said those words; accordingly, I reckon that the idea brings many benefits and drawbacks for the brands.
On the one hand, there are many opinions, which concerned about the cause of why they need to introduce new things in their products. First, advertisements are used to attracting customers by their curious which make people want to come and discover the items to resolve their feeling what new things will have in the items. For example, a company introduces a new device for marketing. Their employee said that the items have never had before and it has an additive point; therefore, individuals will go to visit them; accordingly, even if they like it, Buying a product will become quickly. Second, it seems as if businesses want that their polished brand becomes a phenomenon in cyberspace. In perspective, it makes the number of selling produces be prompted higher than. Besides that, the brands will have risen the widespread lever and the reliability by crowd effect. Taking apple, which usually takes place sharing new products events year by year, as a prime example, they will comment that their items are debut with a unique appearance and change many aspects about software combined with devices attachment; however, like many people know that some information was distortion, and they only an aim which creates a shocking mass media. This helps their new items become more reputed and appeals to a large number of customers to buy. The items are gradually renowned to many residents.
On the other hand, their advertising plan has its advantages and disadvantages. In the advantage regard, studies have shown that the advertisement revenue will be giant if the scheme is successful. Therefore, the companies contribute to their nations where citizens will earn their living more easily rely on the brands, and tax revenues will enrich the national economy. In addition, the companies become reputation increasingly to create a new power-brand in their field; therefore, they will be broken through about currency and open a variety of opportunities to collaborate with other famous brands. Accordingly, they will appeal to talented people to work for them and expand their promising labor market. In contrast, if the publicity is only a stupid polish, the businesses will decline the number of customers because their items do not have any profit and are different from other products. The brands will discredit and even lead to bankruptcy by the lower benefit currency of the original break-even point.
In conclusion, businesses’ advertising helps the investors increase their asset; however, it also have some drawbacks. Accordingly, advertisement necessary for every new product become more popular.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1239, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'medium'?
Suggestion: medium
...ly an aim which creates a shocking mass media. This helps their new items become more...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1308, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...tems become more reputed and appeals to a large number of customers to buy. The items are gradual...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
... increase their asset; however, it also have some drawbacks. Accordingly, advertisem...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, for example, i reckon, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2452.0 1615.20841683 152% => OK
No of words: 467.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25053533191 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75269644029 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533190578158 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 770.4 506.74238477 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.7235684143 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.761904762 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2380952381 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47619047619 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240391603333 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079847771985 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546491683379 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164460171721 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486305800049 0.056905535591 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.