Presented is the line graph illustrating the land use data for nonchemical food in two given countries A and B, in the period from 1985 and 2010
Overall, it is transparent from the chart that country A had spent quite much space to develop pure products. While the two countries' investment is not expanded initially, it is also noticeable that it witnessed a sharp growth land for planting and nourishing.
To begin with, the quantity of land for organic food was the exact total at around 25 thousand hectares in 1985. After that, we cannot see a different change in the next period 1985-1990 that nation A was investing more their space for the organic field than state B with over 50000 hectares and under 49000 hectares (1990), respectively. Five next years, although they till remarkable improved, both nations A and B still had resemblance position as 1990.
On the other hand, nation B passed through state A since 1996 accounted for the lion's share at near 300000 hectares (2000), almost two times higher than the figures for nation A with close 200000 hectares in the same year. From 2000 to 2005, land exploitation in state B peaked at near 300000 hectares regardless of slightly downward; likewise, country A trend also like that with near 190000 hectares (2005). The figures for both two A, B states were anticipated to go down, with a noticeable decrease dedicate to the letter from near 290000 hectares to close 140000 hectares, Whereas the former is likely to fall from near 190000 hectares to 150000 hectares.
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university 78
- The pie charts below present information about what the UK graduates did after leaving university in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- the first chart below shows the number of British visitors to the us and American visitors to the UK from 2011 to 2015 the second chart shows the amount spent by the those visitors in that period 73
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some students prefer to take a gap year between high school and university to work or to travel Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantage 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, so, still, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83908045977 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54851200955 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.447257881 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.875 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.625 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156799952998 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079174654132 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639957544225 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13404752994 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920311612142 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.