There are social medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones What forms do they take Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phone

The increasing use of smartphones could be affecting individuals in various factors. Although mobile phones can provide beneficial facilities, some people might observe harmful consequences. In my opinion, some technical glitches neutralize the overall usefulness of cell phones.

Firstly, with the current trend of increasing usage of mobile devices, human life became straightforward. As the Internet is available on mobile, one can connect with their friends and family via social media. People have become reachable at any time of the day and around the world. Secondly, mobile devices open new opportunities in medical science. For example, from booking appointments for a doctor to ordering medicines regularly, is now a possibility.

On the other hand, the usage of mobile brings harmful effects on an individual. As people are spending more time on social media, it seems they lack social skills in an interaction. For instance, some people like to meet virtually rather than meeting in-person. Furthermore, with constant use of the phone during day and night, problems related to eyesight has grown. The overuse of social media could be deleterious to our mental and physical health. Besides, various technical problems are prone to happen to any mobile device. Such as, sometimes the unavailability of the network can cause mental stress to an individual. Also, it likely to happen that important data could be lost or stolen from their devices. So, if abused, cell phones can be hazardous to a person.

To conclude, although mobile phones are advantageous to humans in social and medical aspects, there are some practical problems linked with them. I believe, technical hazards surpass the benefits created by mobile phones.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43382352941 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85655613531 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621323529412 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.1409699676 49.4020404114 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.7894736842 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3157894737 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26315789474 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277573796356 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793737161436 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750186589581 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183250404438 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841779999005 0.056905535591 148% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.