These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away whereas in the past people used to repair damage and keep them for a long time. Explain why you think these changes that happened. What are the effects of this changing attitude ?
Over the past few years, a thrown-away society can be seen clearly in the growing number of people discarding unusable items unlike those in the past who chose to maintain them by repairing. While there are several underlying reasons behind the phenomenon, it should also be recognized that the tendency can have a profound implication on the environment and individuals.
There are several reasons for this tendency. To begin with, advances in technology have enabled mass production, which usually tends to produce a huge number of non-durable items at lower prices. The availability of products, hence, encourages consumers to purchase new commodities instead of mending them. In addition, commercial advertisements are a powerful contributor to consumerism society as it can tempt people into buying the latest and novelty products. For example, the publication of the new iPhone version attracts a lot of people to change their smartphone although their current one is still in good condition. Another key consideration is that people live a hectic lifestyle where they do not spend much time mending things.
The environment is one of the most affected areas by the trend. To be more specific, raw materials such as trees and metals used for manufacturing are likely to run out in the not-too-distant future because of mass production. Moreover, discharging damaged items, especially plastic ones, into the environment in large quantities will lead to a lack of landfills as well as pollution because its decomposition can take thousand years and emit excessive toxic smoke. For individuals, they can easily get into debt when keeping a habit of buying unnecessary things just for constant gratification.
In conclusion, I believe that there are various reasons for the changing attitude and it has an adverse effect on the environment and people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...tion because its decomposition can take thousand years and emit excessive toxic smoke. F...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37074829932 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06130952263 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646258503401 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4610001167 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.461538462 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153057319906 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482022269252 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401239537257 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0919559304524 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027253072198 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.