Since the arrival of the advanced technology, a wide variety of information is accessible on the internet and television for human beings. Hence, advertising has become a prevailing way of marketing. However, it is often argued that the popular commodities are often because of the potent advertising rather than the actually demands of the entire society. In my view, I completely agree with the prompt
People tend to buy the goods which they is not necessarily needed. This is often due to the fact of the popularity of advertising. A case in point is that the extravagant goods advertised on the television. With the elegant expression and charming images, people often succumb to the temptation of these luxurious commodities. In this case, it is a waste of expenditure for people on account of the fact that those expensive goods are certainly unnecessary to people in daily lives.
On top of the opinion above, people are often persuaded by the other measures of marketing. One particularly salient example of this can be seen in the sale of exercise equipment on the television. The advertisement was endorsed by the celebrities such as popular singer and athletes in order to attract more generation. In this circumstance, people are inclined to purchase the goods by virtue of the sponsorship of famous person rather than the actually need.
Admittedly, advertising not only publicize the goods, but also creates more option for people to select. Nevertheless, I believe it is imperative for the advertising to convey the convincing evidence and efficacy of the commodities rather than promoting for purchasing.
By way of conclusion, as I have argued above, I firmly suggest it is of paramount importance for people to choosing the goods which is surely necessary rather than by its appealing promotion of advertising.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...People tend to buy the goods which they is not necessarily needed. This is often d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, however, nevertheless, so, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18791946309 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07029192282 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523489932886 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9708723137 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.066666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123645982155 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447126000453 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347600917113 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.067143086386 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021759218611 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.