Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic?
What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
Visiting extreme places is increasingly popular among tourists because of the advantage, avoiding several health issues. However, the drawback is able to destruct nature there.
Positively, the immense impact of the remote place visits for people is a panacea for health problems. The reason is that the body is forced to activate acclimatization to cope with the harsh climate as well as gaining vitamins to contribute to particular organ systems, strengthening their immune system. For example, outdoor enthusiasts going to the Tenere desert experience a high intensity of sunlight, responding the body to acclimate automatically with this severe condition to synthesize vitamin D from the light of sun. As a result, the respiratory and cardiovascular system are strengthened, being perfect for those suffering from pneumonia and hearth valve disease, respectively.
Nevertheless, this kind of tourisms has a detrimental effect on the natural environment. This is because, the waste of visitors can harm wildlife animals, risking the endangered species, and the rate of such those creatures decreases considerably. For instance, international tourists taking an excursion in the Artic had polluted this special habitat due to the plastic exposure, and polar bears consumed those accidently. Consequently, this man-made disaster caused a decrease in the population of these endemic species accounted for 30% from 2010 to 2020, then their proportion are predicted to shrink considerably, endangering them being in the edge of extinction.
In conclusion, although extreme tourisms have the advantage to improve visitors’ health, the disadvantage of these is to destroy the wildlife environment. Therefore, if tourists remain struggling to explore difficult condition areas, they shall not throw the rubbish there.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Ahmad Rifki Hardiansyah | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | Ahmad Rifki Hardiansyah | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | ieltsstudent | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-14 | Faryal Gula | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | bangtaenie_77 | 89 | view |
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2019 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012
- The chart below shows the percentage of people different age groups who went to cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011 84
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76579925651 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17416395517 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665427509294 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6376733276 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.25 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.75 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176300991959 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575570010169 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607648446537 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10097403782 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029364607953 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.