Recently, it is sometimes discussed by some people that practical skills are more important than theoretical knowledge. As a result, job seekers may not need any formal qualifications to apply for employment in the future. While this assumption seems to have a point, one strongly argues that holding academic competence is still required.
To begin with, it is undeniable that employ people with higher working knowledge are more economical in cost and time. Companies do not need to spend money on a training to improve their new employee's skills and they could instruct ingenious newcomers to work as soon as they hired them. Furthermore, applicants who have practical skills might be easier to get a job due to they applicable in almost every aspect of life. For example, plumbers and electricians play a vital role whenever there is a problem related to water or electricity system.
On the other hand, one advocates the opinion that theoretical knowledge has more advantage for many reasons. Firstly, there is a possibility that manual work which related to vocational skills perhaps replaced by automation in the future. Therefore, people who hold theoretical qualifications might be more needed by employers to control the machines. Moreover, as they obtain critical thinking learning in their previous degree, academic skilled workers probably less stressful and know better how to deal with problems which may come in a workplace.
In conclusion, despite practical skilled may be very useful in today's job market, one cannot deny that theoretical knowledge is more valuable to have by employees not only for recent but also in the future work-field.
- In today s job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge In the future job applicants may not need any formal qualifications To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree 89
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 78
- In today’s job market, it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- There has been a huge increase in the sizes of the cities Many cities have grown in an haphazard way Why is careful planning important in the development of cities 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'improving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: improving
...o not need to spend money on a training to improve their new employees skills and they cou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2927756654 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85047882124 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627376425856 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2450469926 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4166666667 7.06120827912 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295494161833 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101473210339 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777123972885 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186666021927 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649369432533 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.