In this day and age, the majority of sports activities have long been the dominant type for males, which leads to the superior popularity of man’s TV coverage shows compared to the female. Moreover, many people concede that there should be additional time broadcast on TV sport programs for female to have a balance for both genders. From my perspective view, it would be hard to arrange the same amount of time for both gender broadcast channels but to improve the woman’s limited time for indoor and outdoor activities as followed.
One of the most significant factors of TV channels’ prioritize broadcasting man’s sport to female counterparts is that the majority of audiences immerse themselves in competition for male athletes to hope for gold prizes for their nation in comparison of the channels for females. This encourages television produces to gain more profits, advertising contracts, and well-known sponsorship investment for broadcasting TV sports programs. For instance, when it comes to football, there is no doubt about attracting millions of inhabitants in Viet Nam for the recent World Cup 2022 elimination rounds to become night owls for terrifying shows that cannot put it down whereas the number of viewers pursuing their interest in female’s sport is substantially lower. Besides, due to the physical health of heavy sports such as bodybuilding and boxing, man performs such sports at a higher level, making the shows more stimulating to watch.
However, I am of the opinion that it would be necessary to have an eye on expanding the market in woman’s sport shows. First of all, the government should give equal opportunities for the percentage of coverage to enhance the sporty spirits for woman. Whenever woman appears on the field of sport, they likely go unnoticed and cause certain boredom towards audiences for their weaker physics. Therefore, just like men, female athletes should receive full recognition for their efforts. Secondly, there has been a dramatic rise in the number of audience interests in female sports, and hence better TV coverage will enable females to arouse their endorsements and promote more advertising contracts in order to enhance the family living standard.
To conclude, despite giving man a priority in the area of sport, I believe that it would be more beneficial to strengthen the role of female counterparts in television coverage because of balancing healthy life for each woman.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: thanhlan0201
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or and outdoor activities as followed. One of the most significant factors of T...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g the shows more stimulating to watch. However, I am of the opinion that it wou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to enhance the family living standard. To conclude, despite giving man a priori...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, no doubt, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2385786802 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82678683335 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578680203046 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.1752201607 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.769230769 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3076923077 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5384615385 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376313682983 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140925306577 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610563341849 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231281823003 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784300551991 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.