Today, TV channels provide man’s sport show more than women’s sport show. Why? Should TV channel give equal time for women’s sport and men’s sport?
It is true that in todays modern world, much more males sport programs are on air in comparision with females ones. Although there are convincing reasons why producers are more likely to conduct such masculine programs, I believe that TV channel should offer the same amount of time for both male and female sport shows.
There are several main reasons why TV channels prefer releasing male sport shows to that of female. First of all, it is easily understandable that men are regarded as target customers in such programs which including adventurous and strong activities. According to recently researches, some programs dedicated to sports attracts a large amount of male fan all over the world. For example, a live football match being on air can be watched by millions male big fans that can be bring substantial amount of money for TV channels by signing lucrative endorsement deals and sponsorship contracts. In addition, male are likely to have much more spare time that allow them to stand in front of the TV screen. This is why more sporty programs have been designed for male audiences.
However, I think that they should focus not only on male customers but also female audiences. Firstly, nowadays, females have become more health-conscious. Woman have a tendency to be concerned about their physical problems that leads them to taking up new kinds of sport. Hence, the number of women watching sport show increases significantly such some trendy shows about yoga or dancing. Moreover, TV channels should enhance their opportunities to earn more profit by offering female idols or superstar to attract new customer segmentation. For instance, advertisement in TV female sport shows can do wonders for some kinds of clothes brands or cosmetic company that they have signed contracts,
In conclusion, as I mentioned above, there are convincing reasons why TV channels prefer offering male programs. However, I believe that they should offer equally so as to ultimate the chances to get profit and satisfy customers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-20 | Le Bich Diep | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-16 | nghiemngoc | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | Secret123 | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | trieu23012021 | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | trieu23012021 | 67 | view |
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The diagrams show the cross sections of two tunnels one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese islands
- The diagrams show the cross sections of two tunnels one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese island
- The widespread use of the Internet gives people more freedom at home instead of going to work or college Do you think its advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- the pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... believe that they should offer equally so as to ultimate the chances to get profit and ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13595166163 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73881358327 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558912386707 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2886933184 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374267212062 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125789989363 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954740558384 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229108527551 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684673090766 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.