Today, TV channels provide men’s sport shows more than women’s sports shows. Why? Should TV channels give equal time to women’s sport and men’s sport?
Nowadays, male sports show account for most of the streaming time on sports media, leaving female sports shows with very little attention. The main reason for this issue is the audience preference on gender, and I personally think that equal coverage for both sexes is essential.
It is clear that TV channels give priority to men’s sports programs as there are more viewers watching male athletes than their female counterparts. Coverage of women in sports is often dominated by references to appearance, age, or family life, whereas men are depicted as powerful, independent, and valued as athletes, thereby rendering female sport shows relegated. Additionally, sports involving men are more competitive and more aggressive, which makes their shows simply more dramatic and sensational. Therefore, the number of people watching men doing sports generally outnumber people enjoying female sports shows. Moreover, the commercial aim of the media can generate more profits from matches and contests played by men. However, I believe that equal showing time for both genders should be considered. Increasing awareness and exposure to coverage of women’s sport’s on media will increase interest in and decrease prejudice towards sportswomen and female athletes. Indeed, in recent years, the achievements of female sports have been rising on an incredible scale so they deserve more public endorsement. Furthermore, more showing time may attract more investments from sponsors which are essential to motivating the spirit of female athletes as well as the producers of women’s sports channels. As a result, more appealing events about women doing sport on TV will be produced and it will encourage more sports fans, particularly women to exercise and thus improve their health.
In conclusion, uneven distribution of screen time for men’s games and women’s game can be attributed to gender stereotypes. I am of the opinion that there should be greater equality in the showtime of both genders in the field of sports. As it can upgrade the lives of female sportswomen and promote a healthy message to the public.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40361445783 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80714488731 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569277108434 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3560173836 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.6 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.511492462465 0.244688304435 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165588680232 0.084324248473 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107403708774 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283013209395 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.178041227503 0.056905535591 313% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.