Today, TV channels provide more men's sports than women's sports shows. Why? Should TV channels give equal time for women's sport and men's sport?
It is true that in modern life various men’s sports-related programs is more prevalent than women's ones. While there are various reasons for this trend, I do believe that it is not necessary to spend the same amount of time between two genders’ sport.
There are several compelling reasons for the favoritism for the shows of men’s sport. First and foremost, it is undeniable that there is a discrepancy between the leisure activities of the two sexes that may be a contributing factor. To be more specific, a vast majority of males have a tendency to watch gender-related sports matches during their leisure time rather than females. Therefore, a reduction of the number of females' sports shows will be introduced to increase the number of views with a view to maximizing profits by program manufacturers. Secondly, there is no doubt that it is more appealing to watch men’s court games. In fact, males’ sports consist of more risky situations than women’s ones, which create a sense of adventure and flutter when keeping viewers’ eyes glued to the screen. As a result, individuals in different age groups seem to allocate a greater deal of time following various men’s activities, leading to the difference in time demonstrations between two gender matches.
Owing to the aforementioned reasons, I am inclined with the notion that equal time for males’ and females’ sports should not be exerted. As a matter of fact, if the time for men’s sports is restricted to balance between women’s ones, a large number of viewers will decrease, resulting in the considerable loss of money on an annual basis spent on them. Consequently, in order to meet the sales criteria and expenses for recording, it is of greater importance to maintain the current number of sports programs or even increase the figures for men.
In conclusion, the prevalence and interest are two driving factors to the different distributions of gender-related sports. I believe that TV channels are not essential to provide the corresponding duration for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-18 | kieutrangkg1 | 67 | view |
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Today TV channels provide more men s sports than women s sports shows Why Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 73
- Some people store personal and private information online including banking contacts and addresses Is it a positive or negative trend 84
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 84
- Some people believe that they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e time rather than females. Therefore, a reduction of the number of females sport...
^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ricted to balance between women’s ones, a large number of viewers will decrease, resulting in the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, as a matter of fact, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15223880597 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98899146014 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537313432836 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0686998873 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.285714286 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422062147034 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142419585271 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856680743762 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243646558166 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074046239663 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.