The subjects and lesson contents are decided by authorities such as the government. Some people argue that teachers should make the choice. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that the state provides the curriculum to each school across the country. however, some individuals contend that they are superior to be given by teachers. In my opinion, I somewhat advocate this idea owing to the profound understanding of students’ performance although authorities also have a crucial role to play in equal academic attainment.
The main reason why I do believe that the learning system should be set by the government is that it gives equal learning opportunities to all students. To be more specific, there are various prestigious schools with prohibitively expensive tuition fees that youngsters from low-income backgrounds cannot afford. Therefore, a national curriculum presents a possibility for each young learner to receive a well-rounded education. One good installation of this is on the final examination, students will have a sense of comfort to sit their exam without worrying about the discrepancy in the knowledge given in the tests.
However, it does seem that having a universal educational program can squeeze all students into the same mold instead of entitling them a chance to progress rapidly in their studies. It is undeniable that teachers have a better understanding and observation about their students’ academic performance. Specifically, in one class, there is a difference in each individual’s ability, thus, the freedom to regulate the lesson contents enables teachers to supervise each situation so that all students can make the most of them. In other words, the suitable teaching methods and the educational system could guarantee that no child will fall behind the class. A particular example of this is if a teacher can abandon several unimportant sources of knowledge, can she deliver the most understandable lecture to her pupils. Not only can this approach alleviate the pressure of memorizing a huge amount of information but it also brings about effective lessons.
In conclusion, while the youth of today can reap the benefits from the national provision of curriculum, I would like to reiterate that allowing teachers to make a decision about knowledge imparted is a more appropriate option in most circumstances. Given the situation, I suggest that the government should adopt a right for teachers to make a choice of their teaching depending on the basis of education provided by the government.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-09-10 | Nguyễn Minhh Thư | 92 | view |
2018-11-05 | sahar22 | 78 | view |
- Some people store personal and private information online including banking contacts and addresses Is it a positive or negative trend 84
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Some people believe that they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state Do you agree or disagree 84
- In the future it seems more difficult to live on the Earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live on such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Today TV channels provide more men s sports than women s sports shows Why Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ulum to each school across the country. however, some individuals contend that they are...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to be given by teachers. In my opinion, I somewhat advocate this idea owing to t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32446808511 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12684531303 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577127659574 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.2027416214 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.466666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0666666667 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118551502954 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.035831111236 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468418339717 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.070920559652 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394234240279 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.