Topic: Some people think that it is good for people in a country to broadcast foreign films and TV shows. Others, however, think it is best to produce local films and shows. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There are numerous overseas films and TV shows which are watched by local audiences in recent years. However, some people believe that citizens should only watch their national ones. In my perspective, I do support the former trend for many reasons.
It is clear that films and TV shows imported from other countries provide various benefits. First of all, watchers find it a great opportunity to study foreign languages. It is an authentic learning environment since learners can learn new vocabulary, grammar structures, pronunciation or even idioms and slangs. In fact, thanks to American series like Friends, Games of Thrones, Once Upon The Time and the like that Vietnamese learners have improved their English skills significantly. Moreover, movies or shows which are imported normally have great quality and a wide range of categories. People nowadays strictly require a well-qualified film from images and sound to the plot. As a result, American, Korean or European ones are considered their best choice. Moreover, local movies do not have as many types as the overseas ones; therefore, watchers have to choose the latter to fulfill their desire.
However, local films and TV shows also contribute largely to a country’s development. People should pay attention to their local products since it conveys and reflects their culture and society’s hot topics. Only by watching their national movies can they attain much knowledge about their history and people. Additionally, citizens can contribute to the growth of their country’s entertainment services by enjoying local performances. A national blockbuster can bring a huge profit to local companies, actors and even other related organizations like travel agencies or hospitality services.
In conclusion, both overseas and local TV shows and movies are beneficial to audiences; however, the former is much popular than the latter because of its undeniable exceptional features. Local producers should invest more in their products both in quality and quantity to attract more audiences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-08 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 77
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which the goods are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 90
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012. 53
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52365930599 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93636463332 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580441640379 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7494398673 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2777777778 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168261152351 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573209533674 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516151274187 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112045756938 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254216162142 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.