Every nation all over the world has a history that gives their people pride and character and makes their own cultures. The traditional life, think and attitude of people of each country are the pivotal matters for them, even the young ones. However, the technology effects on some cultural traditions and has changed them. But, should we put away our traditional lifestyles? I want to discuss the importance of preserving these ways of life.
Obviously, all countries respect their own cultural rout and it has combined with the all aspects of their public matters, from the architecture of the buildings which makes cities to their daily habits and foods. In most nations, the traditional skills and facilities are adequate for living on and there isn’t a tendency to being modern citizens. We can see this reluctance in many countries that life still continues based on traditional ways of living.
On the other hand, in the current developed era, the technology fascinates life and it leads to some traditional means are forgotten. For instance, the video calls and online chatting are used instead of some traditional gathering and cultural events. Meanwhile, many daily needs obviate with the internet and people don’t spend their time on going to the prior places in person. People see one another less than before and it is frustrating so greeting has a significant portion for keeping the culture alive.
In conclusion, I believe all of us must try to preserve our traditional routs and use the technology to spread our own culture to other countries. The culture is the identification of each nation and these different traditional lifestyles make the world colourful and beautiful.
- Topic: When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.To what extent you agree or disagree? 78
- Topic: When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.To what extent you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
... and people don't spend their time on going to the prior places in person. People s...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1654676259 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75910301525 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571942446043 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4122101644 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.571428571 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151720501824 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574989643384 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403042769939 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934951886542 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282556439163 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.