Tourism Is One Of The Fastest Growing Industries And Contributes A Great Deal To Economies Around The World. However, The Damage Tourism Can Cause To Local Cultures And The Environment Is Often Ignored. To What Extent Do You Agree Or Disagree?
Despite tourism is an industry expanding all around the world and delivering economic growth, it has been argued by many that, the side effects of large scale tourism has not been considered thoroughly. In my view tourism has many negative consequences on hosting countries that should not be considered negligible.
Tourism brings economic growth to even far remote corners of the world and it should be appreciated but at what cost. Dramatic increase in number of people visiting a particular place have devastating effect on the environment. Every individual traveling to that place have some basic needs for accommodation that should be prepared by locals. Big hotels must be built. Rural roads must be replaced by wide roads for buses and trucks and even hospitals and airports must be constructed. All these changes will cause dramatic alteration in the environment and a considerable amount of air pluttion, noise and deforestation will emerge. As time passes in some places the degree of consequences is so much that the will affect the uniqness and attraction of that particular place in a negative way.
The cultural herritage of a community is an invaluable asset that most of the time will be affected by mass tourism. this danger is so important that in parts of the world governments are passing laws to protect their culture and traditions.
In conclusion, the positive economical points of tourism industry should be evaluated only after considering the negative effects it imposes on environment and culture of local communities.
- Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot money Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to better life Discuss both these views and give your opinion 63
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
- Some people think that art (such as painting and music) does not directly improve quality of people’s life, so the government should spend money on other areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Some people think the government should pay for healthcare and education but there is no agreement about whether it is the government s responsibility What is your opinion 63
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 778, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...and attraction of that particular place in a negative way. The cultural herritage of a commu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... time will be affected by mass tourism. this danger is so important that in parts of...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92318730156 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2055809152 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.583333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148077299146 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538136407255 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546130836779 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109631497315 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395718607439 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.