traffic
Nowhere in history has the issue been more visible than traffic congestion, which takes place day by day globally. In the following essay, I would like to examine the cause and some feasible solutions to improve the predicament.
The explanation lies in the surge in the usage of private cars in conurbations. As cars now are affordable than it was in the past, more of them become vital possession of people. As a result, people commute by their own cars in peak times, and a large number of car on the road at the same time leads to bottle neck. Besides, one of the factors that is attributed to traffic delays is the out-dated transport system. Most of the roads were built a long time ago, which was designed for a smaller amount of traffic. Moreover, the lack of investment in the form of high-capacity public transport also trigger the issue. Most of the public transports now are not satisfactory enough for workers, who had to while away their time going back and forth to workstation every day.
Regarding potential solutions, the most efficient exemplar is to improve the public transportation quality. One of the main reasons why people prefer travelling by cars is that buses or trains are not convenient enough. Hence, if the government improve the service and applied more routes, people would have less yearnings to cars and opt to use public transports instead. Another plausible resolution which has been proved success in inducing countries, namely Germany and Singapore, that is the imposition in cars taxes. Were the price of cars to become extravagant, private cars would be downgraded.
In conclusion, it seems that the main reasons for transport delays can be credited to the increment in private cars and poor investment towards infrastructure of transport system. Thus, potential solutions would involve the improvement in public transportation and the restraining taxes imposition on cars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-30 | Lethanh54 | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-09 | astu | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-15 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-15 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-01-21 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- hosting 61
- traffic 73
- Nowadays the development and popularity of state of art technology in mobile gadgets has changed the way people communicate and connect with each other This revolution engenders a public debate of whether the cons of these devices cancel out their drawbac 61
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowl 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 245, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...te by their own cars in peak times, and a large number of car on the road at the same time leads ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 305, Rule ID: BOTTLE_NECK[1]
Message: Did you mean 'bottleneck'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: bottleneck
...r on the road at the same time leads to bottle neck. Besides, one of the factors that is at...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun yearnings is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... applied more routes, people would have less yearnings to cars and opt to use public...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05362776025 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84212248881 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552050473186 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6427403444 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0962752376108 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374687039177 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786381907617 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651146774805 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652279720962 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 245, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...te by their own cars in peak times, and a large number of car on the road at the same time leads ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 305, Rule ID: BOTTLE_NECK[1]
Message: Did you mean 'bottleneck'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: bottleneck
...r on the road at the same time leads to bottle neck. Besides, one of the factors that is at...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun yearnings is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... applied more routes, people would have less yearnings to cars and opt to use public...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05362776025 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84212248881 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552050473186 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6427403444 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0962752376108 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374687039177 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786381907617 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651146774805 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652279720962 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.