In some cities, governments have tried to reduce traffic congestion. For instance, they have imposed a congestion tax during rush hour. Do you think this development is positive or negative?
Nowadays, reducing traffic congestion becomes one of the hottest problems in many countries. However, some cities intended to impose a congestion tax during the rush hour. My view is that this development is positive.
Firstly, it is obvious that for most commuters, the purpose of driving is very convenience that most workers choose to drive cars. If government levy the traffic jam tax during the peak hour, this means that some people will choose to take public transportation instead of driving which will remission the traffic problems. Therefore, it is positive for government to impose a congestion revenue.
In addition, imposing the traffic tax during the busy hour can benefit the citizen themselves. This is because revenue can be used in the urban construction which means that city designing will become more reasonable which can decrease the problem of traffic jam. If government do not have enough money, most of the cities will not able to replan and this still perplex government and decline the well-being for people.
This is not to say that this solution do not have it negative influence. There are, of course, some cities drivers or commuters maybe need to add extract spending which will aggravate some low income people load, and they could exhibiting antisocial behavior which will increase the percentage of social unrest. But unfortunately this situation happens rarely.
In summary, imposing congestion tax in rush hour has more positive impacts. Meanwhile, we should not ignore the negative effects. By doing so we can ensure that the traffic congestion problem will be solved and the living happiness for citizen could be improved.
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 67
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 the table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compare with 2015 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main f 73
- Some people believe that children should do what their parents tell them to do others think children must learn to think for themselves Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'negatives'?
Suggestion: negatives
...o say that this solution do not have it negative influence. There are, of course, some c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'exhibit'
Suggestion: exhibit
... low income people load, and they could exhibiting antisocial behavior which will increase...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, in addition, in summary, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25746268657 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66772778834 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55223880597 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.6258932513 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440747456865 0.244688304435 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154093107791 0.084324248473 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103500342605 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244395818704 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672071227025 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'negatives'?
Suggestion: negatives
...o say that this solution do not have it negative influence. There are, of course, some c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'exhibit'
Suggestion: exhibit
... low income people load, and they could exhibiting antisocial behavior which will increase...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, in addition, in summary, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25746268657 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66772778834 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55223880597 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.6258932513 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440747456865 0.244688304435 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154093107791 0.084324248473 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103500342605 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244395818704 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672071227025 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.