These days university's education is important to every students for their career and plays vital role in students life. It is often argued that equal number of male and female should be accepted in every subject by the university. However, I do not agree with this opinion because of several reasons.
Firstly, It is not practical to admit equal number of male and female in every subject because the courses that are preferred by men are mostly different than that of women. For example, most of the women are usually interested in courses like nursing, we can find higher number of females studying this course where as men's do not prefer this subject. Furthermore, men are usually interested in subjects like engineering and we can see higher number of them showing interest in this field as compared to women. So, If university apply this type of criteria for admitting the students than most of them will not agree to this and end up not joining the university which will affect the business.
Secondly, I think that current situation in education system is balanced. Moreover, If we apply this rule of accepting equal number of students in every subject this will create an unbalanced context. Therefore, different circumstances may occur such as competition for the same job category and sometimes situation may arise where females may be far beyond than males in profession. This could result in dominant one getting the job thus, This will create scarcity of potential manpower which will lead to unmanaged society.
In conclusion, I would like to say that by this method of accepting the students from both the gender in every subjects by university is not a smart decision. To create a managed and balanced education system they should not follow this trend.
- The line graph shows Paris Metro station passengers Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The pie graphs below show the results of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participate 67
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 73
- The barchart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in Australia divided into three categories from 2001 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...e preferred by men are mostly different than that of women. For example, most of the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... number of females studying this course where as mens do not prefer this subject. Furthe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ersity which will affect the business. Secondly, I think that current situation...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98322147651 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58643864802 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513422818792 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8679773917 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.230769231 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307703862028 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125060646562 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108673473034 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221216132893 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106783587633 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.