The use of corporal punishment (physically hitting students) in schools is in decline, yet it should be used to improve behaviour.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
hitting students in the schools are in decreasing order they should be motivated to change their activities rather than physical torture. It's true, an effective approach for changing student studies is not only the physical punishment whether with such attempts the students stop going to school. The punishment may hamper the brain development of a student, the different way of treating can shift a student cycle.
On the one hand, no scholar wants to move schools for education when they are punished harshly, improving the teaching strategy helps to boom a mind and make them funny rather than a narrow mind. Everyone always wants to get fear-free education lots of consequences arises with a small change in teaching methodologies. Even the students are considered as the pillars of a nation proper care with them in education can shift the direction of a country. Threatening makes them a compulsion to do the activities, but it won't be the exact output as expected. The whole education system might be in a trap with corporal punishment the scholars stop moving school for education even it creates a problem for a government in the long run.
On the other hand, The researchers are making a topic about brain development in early childhood the punishment in school ages can affect its development cycle. Threatening, harassing, and physical torture can reduce the performance level and destroy a brain. we also believe that the morning shows the days, so if someone is affected in the starting of life, then it's hard to spend their entire life. The changed approach in teaching and learning annotations are one of the effective solutions. For example, we can give logical punishment like doing the 100 pages of handwriting which can make them angry but they will grow their ability. Those approaches are effective techniques of learning, the one who gets punished thinks that he is punished but in a realistic it's opposite.
In conclusion, physical punishment is not always the solution for a problem, but effective strategies can migrate students performance to the highest level even increases a shape in creativity.
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The use of corporal punishment physically hitting students in schools is in decline yet it should be used to improve behaviour To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 83
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life. What are those problems?Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns? 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hitting
hitting students in the schools are in decreasi...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mper the brain development of a student, the different way of treating can shift ...
^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... performance level and destroy a brain. we also believe that the morning shows the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10285714286 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81950060711 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6347660166 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.066666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180821806836 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645415777162 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04719279181 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118045357885 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599490647612 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.