Nowadays usage of mobile phones in many places become impolite as smoking. Some people believe in cell phone prohibition like smoking. I'm totally agree with cell phone ban in designated places and in following essay will state my opinion based on facts and examples.
Therefore cell phones keep us in touch with our love ones, friends and families, its impact to social behaviour is enormous. People are more then ever before using their cell phones as a way how to socialise with others. Mobile phone users spend most of their time on communication platforms such as WhatsApp or Skype instead of personal contact with other human beings. This habit cause social anxiety, which have been proven by mane researches and likely leads to sociopathy and aggressive behaviour. This is caused by lack of emotion showed while interacting with others. Despite mobile phone producers developing technologies to make their products more socialised. For example Apple currently developed MeEmoji, which might represent look of user and transfer face expressions into the recorded message.
Secondly, some people might argue that smoking is more harmful to our health than cell phones. Nevertheless, scientists proved global impact to all parts of human body, using mobile phones kills more people suddenly than cigarettes. Brilliant example is using of cell phones while driving car. One of three fatal car accidents in Europe happened due to cell phone use by drivers. Also pedestrians are more likely hit by a car, light rail or train when all they attention is to the screen of the phone when crossing street.
To sum up, I strongly agree with applying rules of cell phone usage in public places, because many people do not think through its negative impact to our metal and body health.
- Most people believe that stricter punishment should be given for traffic offences. To what extent do you agree ? 84
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people are born to be a leader, others believe that leadership can be learned. Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The table below describes victims by age group and offence category in Venezuela, 1999. 61
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...in cell phone prohibition like smoking. Im totally agree with cell phone ban in de...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...opinion based on facts and examples. Therefore cell phones keep us in touch with our l...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... behaviour is enormous. People are more then ever before using their cell phones as ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'causes'.
Suggestion: causes
...act with other human beings. This habit cause social anxiety, which have been proven ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...pened due to cell phone use by drivers. Also pedestrians are more likely hit by a ca...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12328767123 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45788317799 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640410958904 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2527371169 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259584014512 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911067452669 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068958655379 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167275919479 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938877088166 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.