The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree

It is irrefutable to saying that mobile phones change people's lives significantly. However, it has few disadvantages, we can ignore the importance of phones in masses lives. I totally disagree with the given notion that mobile phones should be banned in certain places as it plays key role in humans lives.

Is it necessary to bann phones at selected place? Certainly not. To embark with, with the advancement of technology, people get connect with their loved one from any corner of the world. Besides, it is tremendously pivotal for all citizens to use mobile phones as it saves people's lives in emergency. In exemplification, one can call to the doctor when he or she is not physical stable and call to the ambulance for emergency treatment.

In addition to this, masses can operate their business online while seating at any place. Elders can talk wih their family members who are not with them as a result, they feel socially connected. Further and even more importantly, one can get medical treatment while resting at home with the help of videocall and obtain essential service and can prevent themselves from the pandemic. To epitome, application namely hellodoctor is use by numerous people and received marvelous medical services during Covid pandemic.

Nevertheless, mobile phones have little drawbacks, we can not ignore the vitality of the gadgets. Mobile made life easier than past, hence it is very essential to do not bann phones in certain places.

To recapitulate, it is certainly important to do not bann phones as it has tremendous use in this revolutionary era.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'say'?
Suggestion: say
It is irrefutable to saying that mobile phones change peoples lives...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, in addition, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10305343511 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85583170403 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591603053435 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4074066931 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222891408659 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859829439687 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817132901028 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148140294585 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867809720843 0.056905535591 153% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.