Some people think that organizations would benefit more from young managers than from older ones To what extent do you agree or disagree

It is an undeniable truth to say that youth is a pillar of the organization. Younger can work for a longer duration and more energetic. The youngster has a myriad of advantages for the company. I, however, agree with the given notion that youth is super beneficial for the organization.

To begin with, youth can work for long periods and work more efficiently compared with the older generation. They are more advanced and more practical with technological gadgets. Moreover, youth has contemporary education and training with proper guidance. In exemplification, one who studies in a top university and can execute their knowledge and skill in his job. Youth can take part in the competition and prove themself that they are doing extraordinary work for their corporations. They can attain all the meetings and provide appropriate information to other people by using search engine such as google.

Additionally, youngsters are taking a very little break from their work and can work more productive compared with senior citizens as they physically fit and healthy. Youth are more powerful to communicate with other people in a foreign language and convince very quickly regarding their products. They can travel overseas if required and can deal with difficult situations as well. However, older people have more experience, knowledge, and understanding. They can work under the pressure as well and not scare from some herculean situations.

To recapitulate, I reiterated to say that, youth has more energy and willingness to work hard towards their corporation and they are more benefited from organizations as well.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al with technological gadgets. Moreover, youth has contemporary education and tra...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32170542636 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05343956539 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.308344466 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8125 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.125 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142161017233 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521358783027 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480243240286 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101698074567 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510009481343 0.056905535591 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.