The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the đisavantages?
In the hyper-connected world, social networking sites are marginalizing in-person conversations. While this trend can have some benefits, I believe that it can trigger several drawbacks.
On the one hand, the explosion of social media can benefit both individuals and businesses. Firstly, the use of social network platforms can allow people to maintain and develop their relationships regardless of geographic barriers. In fact, by being active on sites, such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, an individual working in an Asian country can stay in contact with his family member inhabiting another nation within a mouse click. In addition, the advent of these platforms has helped people widen their circle of acquaintances who can share news and knowledge with one another. Secondly, social media can promote work-related convenience and business expansion. In particular, employers can not only carry out assignment delivery and keep track of each employee's task status through a conversation group created on Facebook, but they can also host call conferences facilitated by the technologies embedded in most platforms. Furthermore, a number of companies seem to have got off the ground, thanks to the burgeoning e-commerce market.
On the other hand, the consumption of social media may lead to some drawbacks. First, the use of social networking sites can separate people in the long run. Due to these sites' programmed additive mechanisms, netizens tend to overdose on screen, which may leave them little time to directly interact with others. On the contrary, face-to-face interactions can help create the intimacy that can act as a catalyst to deepen a bond. Secondly, in spite of work done remotely and businesses becoming expansive, the overdose of social media can cause the degradation of the organizational productivity. In fact, employees may easily get distracted by a wide variety of distraction sources, which are also available online, such as computer-based games, viral videos. More importantly, digital advertising may fail to win clients from some specific industries, for instance, real-estate, technology fields, in which in-person promoting conversations are equivalent to a company's professionalism.
In conclusion, social media can make some positive changes in how people network and run businesses. However, I believe that these social networking sites can give rise to several disadvantages that the traditional avenue of communication is able to solve.
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the isavantages 89
- Major cities have become large and overcrowded Why is it happening What measures could be taken to prevent it 84
- Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- The manufacturing and use of cars damages the environment but their popularity is increasing Why is this How could this be controlled 67
- Many women are choosing to have children later in life Why is this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, such as, in spite of, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61273209549 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20811946152 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612732095491 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2023898512 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.555555556 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9444444444 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6111111111 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132803623266 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512789505595 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491658134282 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808230445411 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410270491078 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.