Vehicle free day means the private cars, trucks and motorcycles are banned in city
centres. Only the bus, bicycles and taxis are permitted in the city center. Do you
think the benefits outweigh the disadvantages?
That residents in the city centre should use public transports instead of having personal vehicles has controversial. This essay will discuss about both the pros and cons of opinion that only bus, bicycles and taxis have permissions to move in the center of the city.
To begin with, there are some advantages of this solution. First and foremost, prohibiting private vehicles leads to less congestion. For instance, more public transports are used, less vehicles go in the street. This makes road avoid crowded and people who are in road feel more comfortable. Secondly, fewer vehicles on the street means less exhaust emissions, thus less air pollution. The emissions does not only increase global warming but also be harmful for health of people. Moreover, this method saves money for country since the government does not need to spend more money on building parking lots and widening the roads.
On the other hand, using only bus, bicycles and taxis has some negative affections. Firstly, the limited public transports can not meet the enough demand of the huge number of people in the city. For example, a bus has fewer seats so people who get on bus after other people ma be stand during the trip. This makes passengers tired and uncomfortable. In addition, the habitants who choose the public vehicles can must depend on the bus's schedule and they can even can not stop anywhere they want. Sometimes they can miss the the important works because of that while people who drive themselves can go anytime and anywhere they want.
In conclusion, although there are some disadvantages of using public transports such as bus or taxis and bicycles, I strongly believe that the benefits of it outweigh the negative affections and it is a good solution for city with congestion.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-02-16 | mr.cuong95 | 80 | view |
- Countries where there is high unemployment most pupils should be offered only primary education there is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 84
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attidutes? 84
- 5.Many people go to university for academic study. More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians or plumbers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- In some countries more and more people are buying imported food rather than buying food produced locally Why do people buy imported food What can be done to encourage people to buy locally produced food 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun vehicles is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...tance, more public transports are used, less vehicles go in the street. This makes r...
^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'do'.
Suggestion: do
... thus less air pollution. The emissions does not only increase global warming but al...
^^^^
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...here they want. Sometimes they can miss the the important works because of that while p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...here they want. Sometimes they can miss the the important works because of that while p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56035650472 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560402684564 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9714585368 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.125 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157130539476 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505856734397 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559785816596 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109528479784 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452582916119 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.