Waste controlling
some people argue that there are lots of wastes which do not enter the recycling processes. they believe that governmental and legal forces are only ways to rise waste's recycling. I think (believe) that laws are necessary as a requirement for it, although these are not enough for its implementation.
I think that controlling the process of recycling can not fully be accomplished by government. Existence of some laws is mandatory to force individuals and especially companies to supervise on the wastes that are generating. these rules are mostly performable for residents of big complexes and factories rather than private and detached houses. For example, the government can specify disposal bins for different types of wastes and ask users to put the wastes in their special containers. beside it (besides or moreover or furthermore), regular supervisory and punishment are essential for (people) who deny (violent) these rules and do not obey them.
On the other hand, there are lots of home users who are not manageable, meanwhile, inhibiting solutions for them might not be as effective as companies and complexes. I believe that here training would be more economical compared to controlling and following stringent rules. For example, there are lots of non-recyclable materials like nylon and plastic around us. The less usage of unrenewable materials, the more protection of natural ecosystem. If people can control using plastic and limit the usage of wood made materials like napkin or paper, they will significantly help the government to perform waste recycling more efficient. So, individuals will give help to conserve their natural environment instead of enforcement through rules or punishments.
In short, I believe that implementing each process in society requires predefined rules and waste recycling is not an exception. However, these rules are not enough for implementation and training play a vital (crucial) role in such environmental friendly activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-21 | Esmaeil949 | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
some people argue that there are lots of was...
^^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...h do not enter the recycling processes. they believe that governmental and legal for...
^^^^
Line 9, column 226, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...vise on the wastes that are generating. these rules are mostly performable for reside...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 492, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Beside
...the wastes in their special containers. beside it besides or moreover or furthermore, ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, i think, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46925566343 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04387469778 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563106796117 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5349369392 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.625 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234230773496 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073332867234 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767814986375 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139679752151 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487777858182 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.