As we are facing more and more problems which affect the whole planet, good relationships between different countries are becoming more important than ever before. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Opinions diverge on whether the good relationships between distinct nations are playing more vital roles as compared to the past by virtue of the accretion in the number of global issues. Although some criticize this sentiment, I starkly advocate it on account of some compelling reasons.
It goes without saying that there are multiple reasons why the nations should have good relations with others. One of the most cogent rationales is that one country can not receive the supply of food or financial when they get in troubles if they do not have good relaions with other nations. This is simply due to the fact that when they have to suffer from some natural problems such earthquakes, floods or tsunami, they do not have a close country to offer for funding in order to address the issues. This leads to the situation that they have to face the lack of financial and the diminution of economic.
Another point to further discuss is that having great ralations with others countries means that they receive the help whenever needed. Take India as an example when covid-19 hit the whole world, numerous countries were supported the vaccines and medical equipment from their friends but for India that did not have a good relations with others could not come over the pandemic and had to suffer a bad consequence. Thus, it is crucial to be friends with other countries to get the help in pandemic and economic.
In conclusion, it is perceptible that having good relations with other countries brings several benefits for each other such as the supply of food or financial, especially the assistance to solve the growing problems of the world. From my perspective, I strongly advocate that mentioned sentiment.Opinions diverge on whether the good relationships between distinct nations are playing more vital roles as compared to the past by virtue of the accretion in the number of global issues. Although some criticize this sentiment, I starkly advocate it on account of some compelling reasons.
It goes without saying that there are multiple reasons why the nations should have good relations with others. One of the most cogent rationales is that one country can not receive the supply of food or financial when they get in troubles if they do not have good relaions with other nations. This is simply due to the fact that when they have to suffer from some natural problems such earthquakes, floods or tsunami, they do not have a close country to offer for funding in order to address the issues. This leads to the situation that they have to face the lack of financial and the diminution of economic.
Another point to further discuss is that having great ralations with others countries means that they receive the help whenever needed. Take India as an example when covid-19 hit the whole world, numerous countries were supported the vaccines and medical equipment from their friends but for India that did not have a good relations with others could not come over the pandemic and had to suffer a bad consequence. Thus, it is crucial to be friends with other countries to get the help in pandemic and economic.
In conclusion, it is perceptible that having good relations with other countries brings several benefits for each other such as the supply of food or financial, especially the assistance to solve the growing problems of the world. From my perspective, I strongly advocate that mentioned sentiment.
- The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 61
- The line graph illustrates the amount of spreads consumed from 1981 to 2007 in grams 89
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'relation'?
Suggestion: relation
... but for India that did not have a good relations with others could not come over the pan...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 297, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Opinions
...ongly advocate that mentioned sentiment.Opinions diverge on whether the good relationshi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 323, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'relation'?
Suggestion: relation
... but for India that did not have a good relations with others could not come over the pan...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 7.30460921844 329% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 52.0 24.0651302605 216% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 41.998997996 195% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2850.0 1615.20841683 176% => OK
No of words: 577.0 315.596192385 183% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93934142114 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90110439584 4.20363070211 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60487863082 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.273830155979 0.561755894193 49% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 860.4 506.74238477 170% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 5.43587174349 294% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.3208026301 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.714285714 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4761904762 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.95238095238 7.06120827912 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153081586168 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594408163493 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278499142215 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096123356916 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230072172383 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.