The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the diagram provide an illustration of a modern landfill for household wastes.
It is perceptible that this is a linear process with three main steps in the life of a landfill - the construction, the use of, and the closure.
Overall, a typical landfill is man-made hole dug on a solid, two-layer base in which household refuse is kept and toxic liquids are removed from the landfill by the use of a system of pipes.
The construction of a landfill commences when a large hole is dug out of a site with natural rock underneath. The bottom of the hole is thereafter covered with a thick layer of clay, followed by a layer of synthetic material which helps to stop toxic waste substances from leaching into the surrounding earth. Pipes and tank are also installed in order to remove the toxic wastes liquids from the bottom of the landfill.
When used, the landfill is filled up with household waste, with the leachate being extracted and eventually flowing out of the site in liners. Once the rubbish has been converted into a mud-like compound, the landfill is sealed with clay, and gasses that emitted as a result of the conversion is eventually pumped out to an unspecified zone.
- The map shows how coastal land develops into a coastal park 78
- More and more people decide to eat healthy food and exercise regularly What are the reasons for this trend What can be done to encourage more people to eat healthier and exercise 73
- Task 1 The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 78
- The chart below shows the percentages of males and females with higher education qualifications in 5 countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74038461538 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70523286203 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543269230769 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2308667748 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138429255528 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697397039767 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647893392495 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960483365228 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698121406766 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.