It is believed by some that developed countries should provide humanitarian aid to
underdeveloped countries during natural catastrophes. This essay strongly agrees with this
assertion because richer countries alone have the resources to do so and it is a moral imperative.
Developed nations are financially prosperous, so they have the unique ability to immediately help
others in crisis. As their economies are robust, they can provide the types of aid for countries in
crisis that no one else can. This aid can come in many forms, whether it be emergency health
care and provisions, or even various types of transport, which poorer nations are generally in
shortage of. For example, following the monsoon floods in Bangladesh, many nations helped by
providing temporary shelters, shipping untold amounts of food, and even loaning helicopters for
the evacuation, none of which could have been adequately provided by poorer countries.
The second reason why rich nations should help less fortunate ones is that it is the right thing to
do. From birth, we are all taught that we should love our fellow man and help each other when
we are in need. Being rich does not exempt oneself from this moral imperative. Rather, it makes it
essential, as if people cannot find it in themselves to share their ample resources with people
suffering in other countries, their values will erode at home. For example, Barack Obama once
said that if Americans could justify turning their backs on people who were suffering abroad, it
would then become easier for Americans to start turning their backs on each other.
In conclusion, this essay affirms that wealthy countries should assist poorer ones in times of need
because they have the resources to do so and it is the morally right thing to do.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, then, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15540540541 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61230582231 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574324324324 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3126913179 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.166666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 19.0 4.38176352705 434% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205409135561 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743495648188 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804408287911 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0601878259717 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743080357723 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.