Many people claim that a company must concentrate on both making a profit and embracing social responsibilities. Although it is true that what an organization contributes to local communities can be beneficial, I personally believe the decision to taking charge of social activities depends on the special circumstances of each one.
To begin with, having sense of social duties can be advantageous for not only the enterprise itself but also the local community as a whole. This is because it is the best way to build a company’s brand. By allocating budget, say, to helping disadvantaged residents or solving environmental issues, the company’s image can gain popularities, positively attracting an increasing number of potential customers. Take, for example, Vingroup in Vietnam, which gains strong support form individuals because of its high quality products, coupled with the investment in improving education and medical care, thereby expanding the business and offering more job opportunities for local people. In addition, a business only focusing on maximizing its profit without taking any notice of participating in social activities seems to find hard to maintain in this highly competitive society. Vedan is a good case in point, as we can see, which was instantly ostracized due to discharging a huge amount of industrial waste into the Thi Vai river.
However, I would argue that the performance in community services should be optional because many companies which are small or start entering the workforce have to fully put every effort into how to make money. This allows to deal with an array of financial problems, therefore functioning well and contributing to society by paying taxes. For instance, the total avenue must be at least covers their running costs, such as staff salaries and facility costs, otherwise, it is more predisposed to go bankrupt. Furthermore, those which struggle financially are unlikely to prioritize social responsibilities due to the fact that the main concern is how to overcome such financial difficulties and survive the fierce competition in the business world. Therefore, if a company wants to support the surrounding environment, it is necessary to make sure that it is in good financial health.
In conclusion, while taking the responsibility for social issues can bring great benefits, I would argue the small or unaffordable enterprises should totally focus on making money.
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the world 84
- Some people think that the government has the duty to ensure its citizens have a healthy diet while others argue it is the responsibility of each individual Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects Others say it causes the loss of national identities Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and inclu 89
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects Others say it causes the loss of national identities Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and inclu 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dealing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: dealing
...ort into how to make money. This allows to deal with an array of financial problems, th...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s should totally focus on making money.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2062.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39790575916 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15304111386 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615183246073 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.6975657868 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.285714286 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163178920629 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517071226551 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428479865692 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104213358648 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231906156959 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.