Many people claim that a company must concentrate on both making a profit and embracing social responsibilities. Although it is true that what an organization contributes to local communities can be beneficial, I personally believe the decision to improve surrounding conditions depends on the special circumstances of each one.
To begin with, having sense of social duties can be advantageous for not only the enterprise itself but also the local community as a whole. This is because it is the best way to build a company’s brand. By allocating budget, say, to helping disadvantaged residents or solving environmental issues, the company’s image can gain popularities, positively attracting an increasing number of potential customers. Take, for example, Vingroup in Vietnam, which gains strong support form individuals because of its high quality products, coupled with the investment in improving education and medical care, thereby expanding the business and offering more job opportunities for local people. In addition, a business only focusing on maximizing its profit without taking any notice of participating in social activities seems to find hard to maintain in this highly competitive society. Vedan is a good case in point, as we can see, which was instantly ostracized due to discharging a huge amount of industrial waste into the Thi Vai river.
However, I would argue that the performance in community services should be optional because many companies which are small or start entering the workforce have to fully put every effort into how to make money. This allows dealing with an array of financial problems, therefore functioning well and contributing to society by paying taxes. For instance, the total avenue must be at least covers their running costs, such as staff salaries and facility costs, otherwise, it is more predisposed to go bankrupt. Furthermore, those which struggle financially are unlikely to prioritize social responsibilities due to the fact that the main concern is how to overcome such financial difficulties. Only by this way can businesses survive the fierce competition in the business world. Therefore, if a company wants to support the surrounding environment, it is necessary to make sure that it is in good financial health.
In conclusion, while taking the responsibility for social issues can bring great benefits, I would argue the small or unaffordable enterprises should totally focus on making money.
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects Others say it causes the loss of national identities Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and inclu 89
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk about the dangers of committing a crime To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Discuss the arguments for and against raising pets 81
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s should totally focus on making money.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2085.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4296875 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17247680901 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6171875 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.9181338379 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9333333333 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159935025271 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504434966096 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417532214742 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101109474989 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284226338126 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.