Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion

There has been much discussion about whether should foreigners pay more than local residents when they travel to cultural and historical places or not. The former, in many cases, should be more reasonable.
In many traveling areas, local residents must pay taxes to renovate infrastructure and tackle environment problems, which would be damaged by most of tourism actions. It is easy to witness that public constructions are quickly degraded and littering in wrong places at many tourism attractions. For example, in Da Nang, a city in middle area of Vietnam, various amount of litter was dump to the sea. As a result, government usually rents labourer to collect them. The fee for this case would come from taxes, what local citizens pay. They have spent money on improving those attractions. Therefore, local visitors should be reduced fee when they come to attractions in their hometown.
Admittedly, foreign tourists might pay many kinds of fee, such as: transportation, accommodation, eating out. Those visitors might think it is not fair that they pay more than local citizens for same place. However, these fees would be for new experiences, local cultural what they have never know before. By contrast, local residents are too familiar with their history and cultural. Even, in some situations, they even do not gain any new experiences. It is clear that foreigners receive more than local residents when traveling to the same place. Therefore, the addition fee for foreigners is really deserved and rational.
In conclusion, I would claim that foreign tourits should pay more than local inhabitants for cultural and historical attractions.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...es, local cultural what they have never know before. By contrast, local residents ar...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, really, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in many cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26136363636 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81094041546 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8800737193 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7058823529 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5294117647 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345888493671 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108600352668 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093950610666 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245741318077 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061111433679 0.056905535591 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.