In this contemporary era, companies are competing with each other to reach at the top due to cut throat competition. However, businesses should focus on earning money and social responsibilities as well. I am fully agree with this point of view and will discuss about it in upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, there are multifarious duties of the corporations. Some trading markets mislead their customers just to increase their funds. For example, a few washing powder advertisements replace the dirty clothes with the new ones to depict the effectiveness of the product. Showing suchh fake Adverts will create a false belief among people and trust plays a pivotal role in the relationship of entrepreneurs and clients.
In augmentation to it, companies are source of inspiration for start-ups. They not only inspired by them but also follow their strategies. If they work on financial aspect only, it will decrease their reputation in society. Take for instance, many small businesses try to compete with international companies like Apple, Samsung etcetera by copying there plans and rules. Moreover, some businesses use harmful chemicals in their products in order to increase funds by less investment. They should concern about health and safety of their purchasers as this practice can affect the health rates of country.
After pondering over the preceding information it is seen that business is not about earning cash, social duties are also imperative. So, there is a pressing need for the corporations to maintain a suitable balance between financial and social terms of their businesses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...al responsibilities as well. I am fully agree with this point of view and will discus...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun washing seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little washing'.
Suggestion: little washing
...to increase their funds. For example, a few washing powder advertisements replace the dirty...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35039370079 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96678295526 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.653543307087 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0779794499 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.6 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127733604263 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446744815501 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816939656972 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831098598562 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642265239784 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.