What do you think about human's life in the near future? Could we face to the existential risks which mentioned in the conversation?
Recently, COVID-19 pandemic is making a huge harm of people’s existence all over the world. It is an awakening for us from the illusion of humanity’s eternal life. And after terrified time of this plague, we seems to be concerned about human’s life in near future. Could we face to the existential risks from nature, or from ourselves through the upcoming time? That is a crucial question.
Before claiming any predictions, let us start with some examples through historical record. Like COVID-19, another viral disease called SARS used to threaten the world’s wellness in 2003, especially in Southern China, from which SARS was caused. We used to be scared of it like we are in this time, just a little less being disordered. Besides, disasters on Earth not only come from plague, but also from other natural causes: the Earth is hitting by asteroid disaster, climate change creates a huge rising of global temperature, or other similar natural pandemic beside Coronavirus etc. It makes us wonder: Although we have been survived through all of these, but can we still prevent our peace from the other risks which might be coming to wipe out our planet?
If all we are saying is only about natural risks, it would not be worried that much. People can not only be died out by that, but can also become distinct by many other catastrophes which are caused by people themselves. For instance, nuclear warfare which is created through nuclear weapons invention to inflict damage on enemies; or intentional violence for political or religious purposes like terrorism; even though another natural damage called ecosystem collapse can also be caused by human because of their habitat destruction. Before we find solutions for these risks, should we ask that may Doomsday be nearby just for our dangers? That seems to be the answer for the crucial one we wonder at the first.
But do not let ourselves oversleep on what we messed up. Instead, think about how we can re-build the remains of the world. Because half of root causes is about our faults, we can believe that is it us whom make a false alarm about humanity’s existence on Earth? Is it true that when we change every daily habits, the world is saved a half? We cannot be sure of a none of risk world, but certainly, we know what to do to improve our and nature’s livings. And that is when we can spend all the resources on keeping being survival, instead of wasting them into false alarm we create ourselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-19 | nhatdanthi | 56 | view |
| 2020-03-19 | nvahthy | 67 | view |
| 2020-03-19 | nhatdanthi | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'seem'
Suggestion: seem
...after terrified time of this plague, we seems to be concerned about human’s life in n...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'weapons'' or 'weapon's'?
Suggestion: weapons'; weapon's
...arfare which is created through nuclear weapons invention to inflict damage on enemies;...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, so, still, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 51.0 24.0651302605 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 427.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81264637002 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51001646148 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552693208431 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 10.0 0.809619238477 1235% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1014643548 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8571428571 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09523809524 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228540489023 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075352546797 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624057580247 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151205354673 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735990342563 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.