Long ago, the majority of people inhabit the urban area where everyone knew everyone else. In this age and day, living in big cities has become a tendency where a few folks get to know and are friends with each person there.
I believe that living in a small community brings a lot of pros although there will be hard. One of the main benefits is less pollution. In the city, many factors affect the surrounding environment such as sewage that pollute the water or the smog of vehicles causing air pollution. But in a small village, people will feel relaxed and enjoy a peaceful life with fresh air. Moreover, the populace will never feel lonely when living in a small community because they can acquainted and be friends with neighbors, and they can have parties or help each other to make and maintain friendships stronger. For example, they can help take care of children as their parents are at work.
Nevertheless, it has numerous cons that impact the lives of villagers. First of all, lack of infrastructure such as schools, and laboratories ... it is worth mentioning that because it is far from the city, the quality of education here is also not good. In addition, on account of the cost of living is very low, and having fewer career opportunities than in the city, leads to many people being out of work.
In general, the advantages of living in an urban area are greater than the disadvantages. People have a sense of belonging since they live in a close-knit community and rarely feel lonely
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 471, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'acquaint'
Suggestion: acquaint
...g in a small community because they can acquainted and be friends with neighbors, and they...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, for example, in addition, in general, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70188679245 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58595247565 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588679245283 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8087215247 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145807207242 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048190026339 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524458359655 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855110324498 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490861468456 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 471, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'acquaint'
Suggestion: acquaint
...g in a small community because they can acquainted and be friends with neighbors, and they...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, for example, in addition, in general, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70188679245 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58595247565 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588679245283 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8087215247 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145807207242 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048190026339 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524458359655 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855110324498 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490861468456 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.