To what extent does the Internet increase social cohesion?
It is true that the Internet has had a strong influence on social connection. It has affected relationships in various ways, and in my opinion, there are both positive and negative effects.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that the Internet can bring people closer together. Social networking sites now allow people to broaden their social reach both personally and professionally, those sites not only permit users to stay in contact with friends and relatives but also reconnect with old friends from the past. The Internet also provides opportunities for people to make new friends, to connect with strangers in far-distant places who share similar interests, and they interact through their computers rather than face-to-face. Moreover, in the business world where people need to contact each other a lot, the Internet facilitates those meetings and connections to be more convenient with some apps such as Skype, Gmail. Internet eradicates the limits imposed by the physical world and makes it possible to communicate and exchange information with people everywhere.
However, concern for the social isolation caused by the Internet is growing. As people spend more time interacting with each other online, they spend less time in face-to-face communication. The Internet can lead to separation as families and neighbors spend less time together while they are busy using the Internet. As a consequence of that phenomenon, children in those families will be neglected by their parents who are definitely bad examples. Furthermore, in workplaces, people will spend all day reading emails and will have no time for bonding activities which could lead to the lack of connection between members of the company and bad for teamwork.
In conclusion, the Internet has certainly had a strong impact on the social cohesion, revolutionised communication between people, but not all of the outcomes of this revolution have been positive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- Because some children don t have the natural ability to learn language school should not force them to learn foreign language Agree or disagree 73
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion My work 84
- In many countries around the world life expectancy is increasing Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this situation and give your own opinion 11
- What do you think about technology in education What are the pros and cons 51
- The graphs shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...both positive and negative effects. On the one hand, it is undeniable that ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...information with people everywhere. However, concern for the social isolatio...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 661, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs of the company and bad for teamwork. In conclusion, the Internet has certainl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 140, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...d communication between people, but not all of the outcomes of this revolution have been p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46052631579 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01789446148 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575657894737 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2592941893 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.692307692 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134669628188 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607448507001 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551823969887 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0919675795566 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01181465171 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.