When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.

With the advancement in technology, the nations are becoming increasingly developed. There are arguments that technological development leads to vanishing of traditional practices and skills which should be preserved. This essay will discuss about how the commence of technology has changed the lifestyle over time and there is a need to preserve cultural heritage of a country.

The innovation of new computer based world has resulted in diminishing the old cultural schooling patterns, instead people shifted to modern methods of study. In other words, people are attracted more towards recent technologies like live classes on laptop, distance courses from overseas institutes, etc., earlier they were stuck to traditional knowledge only. Moreover, there are numerous of electrical gadgets available in the market replaced for humans to perform various skill activities. This leads to altering of lifestyle as compared to old days.

The early people used to travel through horses or bullocks but invention of automobiles has improved the transportation facilities. Nowadays, people prefer travelling through air or rail to safe time and do not want to practice traditional ways of transport.this has lead to evaporation of nation's heritage. As a consequence, the young generation is far away from their culture and involved more in latest technological world.

In conclusion, although advent of technology is important to be a developed nation, the cultural background should remain alive through museums, books and movies.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rved. This essay will discuss about how the commence of technology has changed the lifestyle...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the latest'.
Suggestion: in the latest
...ay from their culture and involved more in latest technological world. In conclusion, ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, in conclusion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 230.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68695652174 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07715529151 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.669565217391 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6790138926 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.909090909 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0918943943015 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.035782239713 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327155549639 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0542751284916 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324923513352 0.056905535591 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.