When international media conveys the same messages to global audience, people argue that the expansion of international media has negative impacts on cultural diversity. What is your opinion?
The media are now exploited to send the variety of messages by its wide-fast-spreading nature. Many people maintain that it could compromise the cultural diversity. I with this statement because of several reasons.
To begin with, the media are now strongly influence on youngsters by its advertising ability. Media such as TV, radio can easily show an advertisement about the outer food products which are directly compete to the local products. For example, many are like to eat the chemical-sugar candy instead of coconut candy nowadays which would lead to obesity and diabetes.
Moreover, by the marketing strategy, media impair the traditional music which is one of the cultures of a country. To explain more, international media tend to introduce the other music from other country. In fact, teenager indulge in K-pop and then ignore the traditional music which leads to traditional music value faintness.
From another angle, media are fast-spreading so authorities can take advantage of. Media empower the authorities to expand the local culture such as food or custom to their neighbor country so that they could reserve the traditional value and also promote the image of that country to every corner of the globe. For example, in fact, tourists are able to have thorough insights into a foreign destination through the internet which would lead to enhance the local life.
In conclusion, international media could cause positive and negative influence to the culture of the countries. Therefore, the government should decide cleverly in order to keep and grow their value.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-25 | ali.rs | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-25 | ali.rs | 56 | view |
| 2020-12-14 | Azizbekakajon | 56 | view |
| 2020-02-19 | trkienpham197 | 87 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | shozruxatashev | 56 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3162055336 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90073339787 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584980237154 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3907960746 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0714285714 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180277808159 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655946059252 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663461022753 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103199221996 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373380736487 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.