When new towns are planned it is important to build more public parks or sports facilities than shopping centers To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

When new towns are planned, it is important to build more public parks or sports facilities than shopping centers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is suggested by some that urban parks and sports halls are more important than shopping malls, and thus malls do not have to be included in a new town. I disagree with this opinion, however.

The importance of parks in urban planning is undeniable. Children love parks because they can find there rocks, soil, and trees - things that are different from what they see at home. The parks can also have buildings and other artifacts such as fountains, monuments, and statues that attract tourists. Additionally, urban parks increase the health quality of its local residents, since park vegetation reduces pollutants.

Sports halls also improve the quality of life of urban citizens. In crowded cities, sports halls are one of the few options for doing physical activity. Team sports like basketball and football are a great source of entertainment and local pride.

However, it is ridiculous to not build any shopping mall at all just because we need spaces for other recreation areas. Malls are an integral part of our modern life, since the contemporary economic model is built entirely on buying and selling products. To a visitor, a mall is only a place for hanging out, but to a shop owner, it is where she earns money for herself and her staff. Shopping malls also help new towns foster community sense. People often go shopping with their friends, coworkers, or family relatives. During the purchase, customers can chat with each other and mingle, developing friendly relationship.

To conclude, shopping malls are just as important as parks and sports facilities. Their inclusion in the planning of new towns is thus highly recommended.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-10-22 Sarah Tran 73 view
2020-10-22 Sarah Tran 61 view
Essays by user Sarah Tran :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09191176471 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64501839593 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628676470588 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7009163414 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4705882353 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.41176470588 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272282302553 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859928016273 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777462530839 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169309061734 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088277377251 0.056905535591 155% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.