Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagre ?
Whenever a man achieves his dream successfully, there are always people who tend to think that he is just lucky. However, I completely disagree with those people believing fortune is the main factor contributing to people’s success.
It is their hard work that is the main reason of people to achieve their aims. We all know many billionaires and famous men who had to work flat out to become the one as glorious as nowadays. For example, Nick Vujicic is an Australian speaker and he lost his 4 limbs, which means he is not lucky at all. Despite his lack of fortune, he becomes an influent speaker who encourages people feeling lost around the world. He also writes loads of books to motivate unlucky people and give them hope. He now lives happily with his family and enjoys his beautiful life. Apparently, he worked hard and was determined enough to meet his success today. In terms of science, there was Edison who had tons on failure before finding out the lightning bulb. It was all due to his determination.
Luck is only a small factor contributing to one’s success. If a student just relies on luck and doesn't study at all, he will definitely fail. Maybe in a specific time, a lazy man will success thanks to luck. However, it doesn't mean that he will reach his goal in the rest of his life without trying his best. For instance, there is no man who win lottery the second time. It's the reason why we must not solely rely on fortune.
In conclusion, although some people achieve his aims thanks to luck, they do not always success if they aren’t hard-working. All people should be industrious and determined to attain their goal.
- People should follow the customs and traditions when people start to live in a new country. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 73
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagre ? 61
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s. If a student just relies on luck and doesnt study at all, he will definitely fail. ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ill success thanks to luck. However, it doesnt mean that he will reach his goal in the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...no man who win lottery the second time. Its the reason why we must not solely rely ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, may, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67123287671 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57648073067 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592465753425 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4294962549 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.7894736842 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3684210526 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0717759743508 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.026553598351 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437350010219 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0591615520661 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047030305061 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.0946893788 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 50.2224549098 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.21 12.4159519038 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.