While mobile phones have many advantages, a number of problems have also resulted from them or the ways in which they are used.
What are some of these problems? What solutions can you suggest for solving these problems?
Althought the usage of cellular devices make our lives easier, it also results in many problematic issues. In this essay we will discuss what problems do we have with mobile phones and how can we solve these issues.
In most of the countries of the modern world cellular phones are used as the main tool for people-to-people communication. As most part of the cellular phones are smartphones, people use them to navigate in the net or to enter their accounts of social networks such as Facebook or Instagram. As a result, they become less communicative, less sociable and more introvert as they use the technologies instead of face-to-face communication. Moreover, people are keen to use the device while driving, thus becoming less concentrated on the road, which is really dangerous for their lives. According to a research done in my city, 95 percent of young people are communicating between each other through smartphones and 60 percent of the road accidents are the result of using mobile phones while driving.
As a solution for this problem, I would recommend the govenments to take legal actions in minimising and in some cases prohobiting the use of mobile devices. For the socially active places such as restaurants, cafes and bars, the speed of the internet can be lowered, thus making the internet surfing more diffucilt for the mobile phone users. In regard to the drivers, I would suggest to make the fines for speaking or texting while driving much higher. These actions will support people to interract with others more in the real life and also to be more cautious when driving a car.
As a counclusion, I think that the disadvantages of the mobile phone can be lowered if the governent takes the responsibility to generate more limitations for its usage, especially in sociable areas and during the driving.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-15 | qhuy0168 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | keval_1020 | 89 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, really, so, thus, while, i think, such as, as a result, in regard to, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9674267101 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88031883042 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560260586319 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.113864494 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.083333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263179571537 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855119277681 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608703379541 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149253525703 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741714686509 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.