In a modernizing world, mobile phone becomes an essential device of every people. However, while cellphones create many utilities for their end-user, the way they are used may cause some negative effect on human, which is sometime overlooked. The problem of personal phones might be came from different aspect of living activities and their resolution also shown up various.
The problematical issue that cellphones create to human today is simply related to the fact that mobile devices are become smarter rapidly. Since these smart mobile technology pieces is accessible to entertainment forms at any places, people are now abusing this feature that much of the time, they are unaware of connecting to the surrounding sociality. Presently, it is not hard to see group friends get their head only on phones while going out instead of talking and spending their quality time with the others. The issue can be eased in term of every single person controlling their needs of media or game consuming, people need to aware that humane bonding time is more fundamental rather than mediocre screen entertainment.
From a children nurturing perspective, many parent are currently abusing the relaxation function of mobile phone to assist with their children caring periods. The games, cartoon that is would easily can be found by adult on any smart phone services is full of delight for their kids. Despite the fact that there can be a large amount of inappropriate content mixed with the entertaining consuming forms that they feed their children, modern parents seem to be overused the phones to take care of their young beloved ones. Catched up with the situation, abundance of video and game providers are now supporting child-care with their products such as reviewed content and limited consuming time function are now added. Friendly all-age-appropriated content seems to be a great suitable solving method for this conundrum and are being expanded widely.
Although mobile phones are now caring many positive aspect to human life, they are usually be used without cautions. The recommended prescribed usage method should be accounted from the phone services providers, educators and every parent to their children and themselves.
- In some countries fast food restaurants and supermarkets give money to schools to promote their products do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- Some educationalists say that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others however believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime Discuss both views and give your opinion
- While mobile phones have many advantages a number of problems have also resulted from them or the ways in which they are used What are some of these problems What solutions can you suggest for solving these problems 78
- In many workplaces online communication is now more common than face to face meetings Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 80
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 6, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a child' or simply 'children'?
Suggestion: a child; children
...mediocre screen entertainment. From a children nurturing perspective, many parent are ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun parent seems to be countable; consider using: 'many parents'.
Suggestion: many parents
... From a children nurturing perspective, many parent are currently abusing the relaxation fu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29213483146 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72329975774 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589887640449 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.8276346499 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.571428571 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160459869083 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600301271269 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429160087296 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112843695507 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600447441394 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 6, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a child' or simply 'children'?
Suggestion: a child; children
...mediocre screen entertainment. From a children nurturing perspective, many parent are ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun parent seems to be countable; consider using: 'many parents'.
Suggestion: many parents
... From a children nurturing perspective, many parent are currently abusing the relaxation fu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29213483146 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72329975774 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589887640449 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.8276346499 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.571428571 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160459869083 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600301271269 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429160087296 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112843695507 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600447441394 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.