Being more attentive to the personal attributes rather than academic degree and practical wisdom is a recommendation for employers during the recruitment process. personally, I totally agree with this way of thinking because of two major reasons that are explained in this essay.
on the one hand, employers' tremendous emphasis on qualifications and experience can lead to a major drawback. The problem will qualifications is that the knowledge taught in school would never be fully applicable in real life. Additionally, every jobs have different requirements, making previous experiences irrelevant to a degree. this is why employers may want to pick a different standard to evaluate their future employees.
personal characteristics, on the other hand, can be a golden metric to consider for employees. these attributes would not change dramatically over time, making them highly specific to an individual. this means that when people are evaluated to be intelligent, they will excel in any job position without needing to finish before. also, this is a holistic perfect because an employee endowed with exceptional personal qualities can play a pivotal role in nurturing a conducive work environment. For example, an individual who exhibits stellar communication skills and a cooperative attitude will likely foster a positive environment, and serve as a catalyst for harmonious team dynamics, ultimately driving innovation and bolstering overall productivity.
in conclusion, although there are controversial opinions about determining which is the most essential factors when it comes to considering a person for a job opening. I think that qualifications and experiences are all about the past, which characteristics would not change over time
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Personally
...ployers during the recruitment process. personally, I totally agree with this way of think...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sons that are explained in this essay. on the one hand, employers tremendous em...
^^^
Line 2, column 4, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...s that are explained in this essay. on the one hand, employers tremendous emph...
^^
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ous experiences irrelevant to a degree. this is why employers may want to pick a dif...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rd to evaluate their future employees. personal characteristics, on the other h...
^^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Personal
...to evaluate their future employees. personal characteristics, on the other hand, can...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...lden metric to consider for employees. these attributes would not change dramaticall...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... them highly specific to an individual. this means that when people are evaluated to...
^^^^
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...ition without needing to finish before. also, this is a holistic perfect because an ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...and bolstering overall productivity. in conclusion, although there are controve...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65151515152 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32809505762 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651515151515 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7398170736 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.769230769 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156429250583 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528210600787 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509107658713 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983940814856 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483548614349 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.