Whoever controls the media also controls opinions and attitudes of the people and there is little can be done to rectify this To what extend do you agree or disagree
From many decades, media has acquired tremendous popularity across the globe. Irrespective of the age factor, it has been the controlling source in many aspects. Many claims that media authorities have the power to play with the thought process of masses and it is challenging for a common man to overcome it's after effects, while many other believe that it completely varies from individual to individual on what to extract from displayed information. Although the impact of media on one's personality is irrefutable, the final intake from the media presentation is one's own responsibility. I partially agree to the given statement and think that a wise selection of appropriate shows not only serve as a source of pleasure, but also enhances knowledge by connecting at global levels.
It is undoubtable that media has become an indispensable part of human life, but whatever is telecasted and its take away by community is completely under control of media persons. While telecasting local or global news, controlling the publishing as per their benefit can create lot of dissatisfaction in public. Moreover, as in old era, cultural and traditional epics maintaining a healthy dose of entertainment and values were more popular and so were the etiquettes and manners in society. For instance, People were more respectful and connected with their society. But nowadays, diversion of media towards politicizing the ideas, promoting nuclear family structure has changed look of society to a greater extent. In addition, new trending fashions as shown by media artists are highly imitated by young viewers irrespective of the fact if families can afford it or not. So, it is undeniable fact that media controllers have full grip over the behaviour and opinion of society.
On the other hand, being a matured and responsible citizen, one can not fully blame the media system. As, it is evident that media is an amalgamation of entertainment and knowledge. Introducing educational videos and talent shows can help to increase knowledge and competitive skills. For example, many shows as Americas got talent, quiz shows not only entertain but encourages kids to explore their talent. Hence, this is individual's duty to have a control on their thoughts and choice of programmes.
To conclude, Media has been a favourite source of enjoyment from many generations. Although many people argue on its social impact due to monopoly of various media bodies, but they are not powerful enough to control reader's viewpoint. As per my opinion, Keeping a good hold on one's thoughts and by maturely selecting useful shows, one can appreciate the benefit of media instead debating on controlling authorities.
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 84
- The chart below shows the total number of Olympic medals won by twelve different countries 78
- 59
- Some people believe that the government should spend more money putting in more works of art like paintings and statues in cities to make them better places to live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...hallenging for a common man to overcome its after effects, while many other believe...
^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... impact due to monopoly of various media bodies, but they are not powerful enough...
^^
Line 7, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ad debating on controlling authorities.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2266.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 432.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24537037037 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9897766764 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560185185185 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 731.7 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.375829349 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.3 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216806627137 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647886850437 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412791770709 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132386032051 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267910897422 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 78.4519038076 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.