The bar chart shows the percentage of households with cars in a European country between 1972 and 2001.
The given bar chart details the proportional change in the number of houses in a European country who possessed any car over a period of 30 years from 1971 to 2001.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the trend of having one or more cars witnessed a significant increase, while a reverse trend in the context of owning no car at all. However, the majority of the houses loved keeping only one car over time.
According to the given illustration, nearly one in every two households was without any car at the start of the period. However, with the passing years, this rate fell steadily to only 3 out of 10 houses.
on the other hand, 1971 onwards, the popularity of owning one or more cars observed a sharp surge. Whilst the former rose dramatically from 30% to more than 50% in 3 decades, starting with only one-fourth of the households, the latter underwent a few fluctuations before climbing to a value just 10% below the rate of former choice.
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production 84
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- The two maps below show the changes in the town of Denham from 1986 to the present day 73
- In some countries owning a house rather than renting is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative situation 78
- The column graph shows the rate of consumers in three age groups taking healthy food between 2011 and 2016 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...steadily to only 3 out of 10 houses. on the other hand, 1971 onwards, the popul...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70114942529 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6429534239 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614942528736 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5707070661 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.857142857 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176950393499 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774995233086 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672975705169 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111921311605 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746785506104 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.