In this 21st century, due to the ever-growing population, which causes no inhabitation for wild animals; as a result, it seems that the preservation of these animals could be wasting resources. However, I oppose this notion because the protection of wild animals aids scientific research, and improves the nation's economy.
To begin with, it might be said that scientific research completely relies on wild animals whenever they discover new medicines for convenient human survival; thus, it demands to preserve the forest animals. To illustrate, wild animal, a rabbit has vital organs which resemble humans' organs; hence, scientists apply an initial test dose on it and adjust the precise dose before reaching humans. Similarly, the king cobra, a snake, is utilized for various medical purposes. Therefore, wild animals should be necessarily protected.
Moreover, the forest animals might boost the nation's economy. For example, the National Zoological Park, New Delhi, India imposes a certain amount of tickets to access entry for seeing various kinds of animals to the public. Hence, it aids the nation's revenue. In addition, Indian animal conservationists reveal that one billion dollars of revenue is created annually on the entire national parks with excluding animals' expenses. Besides this, while visiting these Gardens, children can gain knowledge practically, despite learning on subjects. Consequently, to boost the country's economy, it is essential to preserve wild animals.
In conclusion, I reiterate that there is no doubt that wild animals' protection is mandatory, which aids new drug discovery and revenue generations. Therefore, animals also deserve places for living like humans.
- Some people think that there are things individuals can do to help prevent global climate change Others believe that actions of individuals are wasteful and irrelevant and it is only government and large businesses that can make a difference Discuss both 95
- While studying some students take weekend or evening jobs to help with expenditure. How do you feel about this? What are the drawbacks and benefits of such a decision? 78
- some people think women should be allowed to join the army the navy and the air force just like men To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering computing and medicine Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people rich countries are stealing from poor c 60
- IELTS Task 1 - Tables give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...s scientific research, and improves the nations economy. To begin with, it might be ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ver, the forest animals might boost the nations economy. For example, the National Zool...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...imals to the public. Hence, it aids the nations revenue. In addition, Indian animal con...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...terate that there is no doubt that wild animals protection is mandatory, which aids new...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64591439689 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.819967605 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630350194553 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6274047864 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.642857143 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183385888142 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637156136006 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578939438677 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130899304611 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067170642194 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.