Working from home has become more common with technological advances; however, it has many challenges associated with it. What are some of the challenges that someone working from home may face? What are some of the influences on society of more people working from home? What is your opinion?
The advent of the Internet has enabled the trend for working remotely rather than commuting daily to work. Like many other technologies, this has not only some positive influences on the society, but also challenges for those remote workers, and this essay will explain why I think working at workplace should be better.
To begin with, the beneficial impact of this practice would cause less traffic congestion in many cities nowadays. Commuters do not have to endure the daily commute or get a chance of being late because they have to drop their kids at schools. To put this further, minimizing traffic congestion, especially during rush hours, means lower level of air pollution, which is also a critical problem. For example, if more than a half number of workers were allowed to work from home, then a half number of vehicles would not show up on the streets, and the air would be much fresher. However, there are challenges that need to deal with remote workers in return.
In this modern world, the feeling of isolation is not uncommon and working from home would exacerbate this. A lack of colleague interaction might actually cause people more stressed than working in cubicles. Not to mention, there are projects that require face-to-face or teamwork-orientated discussion, but in term of telecommuting, send emails or making phone calls is the only option available. Furthermore, everyone who has ever tried to organize a conference call knows that face-to-face interactions are normally more effective and productive than trying to commuting remotely.
In conclusion, it is manifest that working from home is a mixed bag. Although it helps reduce heavy traffic and air pollution, having everyone at homes all day is probably not the best solution because people need to communicate directly to each other.
- It is argued that art galleries and museums should not be funded by governments and that government money is better spent on necessities such as health care Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Women are better at childcare than men therefore they should focus more on raising children and less on their working life To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Mobile phones are considered essential by most people nowadays Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of mobile phones and state your opinion 89
- The graph shows the percentage of people who recycle their rubbish in five countries over 12 years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun colleague seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lack of colleagues'.
Suggestion: A lack of colleagues
...orking from home would exacerbate this. A lack of colleague interaction might actually cause people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, then, for example, i think, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13087248322 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80780857939 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620805369128 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7760175964 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.615384615 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249730136371 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866517818492 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561474576723 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142665301185 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133192726004 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.