As the world becomes technologically advanced, computers are replacing people at more and more jobs.
What are some job positions that may be lost because of computers? What are some problems that may result from this situation
Undoubtedly, due to breakthrough technology these days, Computers have put a lot of people out of their jobs. A lot of positions have been put under scrutiny following this development. This essay will discuss the positive and negative ramifications of such a phenomenon.
There are numerous jobs that are becoming a thing of the past due to technological advancements. Let's take the medical field as example. Robots have been built that could perform common surgeries perfectly with little to no errors. This cutting-edge technology has made it possible for a lot of surgical procedures to be performed accurately in a well timed manner. Another example, the military in the US are using unmanned planes such as Drones for surveillance and to carry out technical attacks. These planes are controlled remotely from a command post somewhere. By this, the US troops need not be deployed in the field. As these examples show, most of these positions would not have been put in jeopardy if the conventional methods had stayed the same.
With computers substituting human jobs, this phenomenon has benefits as well as drawbacks. Some of the benefits it has such as making life more convenient. In other words, doing things have never been easier after this innovation of technology. For instance, postal workers will stand for long hours sorting out mails and selecting which mail goes where; in the past. Also by using computers to do some difficult tasks, humans are saved to do more important and less tedious assignments. In contrast, using computers to do most of today's jobs, people become more lazy contributing to sedentary way of living. As a result, causing health related problems on the long run.
To conclude, while advanced technology has brought a lot of positive changes to the work force, it has also displaced different people from their jobs. And this is considered a drawback. It is hoped that in the future a balance should exist where computers and humans work together hand in hand. J
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-10 | Kamaludeenzayyana | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...past due to technological advancements. Lets take the medical field as example. Robo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tary in the US are using unmanned planes such as Drones for surveillance and to c...
^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...enon has benefits as well as drawbacks. Some of the benefits it has such as making life mor...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ing which mail goes where; in the past. Also by using computers to do some difficult...
^^^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the todays') or simply say ''most todays''.
Suggestion: most of the todays; most todays
...nts. In contrast, using computers to do most of todays jobs, people become more lazy contribut...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, while, for instance, in contrast, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04204204204 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80817553116 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57957957958 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0187728381 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.9523809524 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09523809524 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241636053903 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663172136736 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512041240677 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137739931643 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483045944491 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.